Skill guides · 2 min read
Sanctions ownership exposure
Trace bounded source-attributed ownership and control relationships associated with risk-screening candidates.
When to use it
Use this to examine source-attributed ownership or control relationships around risk-screening candidates. Supply a clear subject and any known identity identifiers. The aim is to understand supported connections and the boundaries of the available records.
Before you start
Available on Pro and Agency. Replace the illustrative inputs with your subject’s details.
Supply optional Identifier type and Identifier value together, or leave both blank. Use only identity details you know.
| Field | Required | What to enter |
|---|---|---|
| Subject type | Required | Choose PERSON, ORGANIZATION. |
| Subject name | Required | Enter subject name. |
| Aliases (semicolon separated) (optional) | Optional | Known alternate names, separated by semicolons. |
| Birth date (optional) | Optional | Known date, such as 1980-01-01. |
| Nationality (country code) (optional) | Optional | Known country code, such as sg. |
| Jurisdiction (country code) (optional) | Optional | Known country code, such as bg. |
| Identifier type (optional) | Optional | Choose idNumber, registrationNumber, taxNumber, leiCode, passportNumber, innCode. |
| Identifier value (optional) | Optional | Enter identifier value. |
Run the Skill
- Find Sanctions ownership exposure in Skill library and select Use template.
- Fill the template fields and review Preview.
- Choose Insert into chat to load the composer.
- Check the case and send the unchanged request. Reopen the template to change inputs.
Subject type: PERSON Subject name: Alex Example
Read the results
Follow each relationship to its source, preserving the parties, direction, dates, and any published ownership percentage. An indirect connection requires evidence for its individual links. The traversal is bounded and can be incomplete; missing links stay unresolved. Reported percentages do not automatically determine aggregate ownership or legal blocking, and a risk candidate must still be distinguished from a confirmed identity match.